Jinhu tire needs serious reflection
since it was exposed by the media on March 15, there have been continuous negative reports on Jinhu tire, which can be described as "pressing the gourd to float up". Is it the media deliberately looking for trouble, or does Jinhu need to reflect? The answer is self-evident
the tree wants to be quiet but the wind doesn't stop
when Jinhu tried to let the "recall" cool down naturally, two articles about Jinhu yesterday pushed it back to the attention of the media and friends
neither the "helplessness" in the recall attitude nor the slow follow-up progress can make consumers and the media see Jinhu's sincerity. There is no doubt that China has become the largest auto market in the world. If any brand wants to seek development here, it must give Chinese consumers enough respect
second, Jinhu needs more standardized management. Whether the Tianjin factory is exposed or the Changchun factory strikes, Jinhu's internal management also needs to be improved
although the Tianjin factory finally concluded that individual workers violated the rules, it was internal contradictions that led to the exposure from lawyer Huang Jin's disclosure. Think about it carefully. Such "personal illegal operation" may have been known or used by the manufacturer for a long time, otherwise personal accidental actions are difficult to be captured at a specific time
before being exposed by CCTV, Jinhu Tianjin factory can enter at will, and so can Jinhu Changchun factory before being reported by the media due to the strike. Although this provides convenient conditions for media exposure, it can still be seen that the details of management are not in place
from the strike of workers in Changchun factory, Jinhu should also reflect on whether its attitude towards Chinese workers and incentive system are reasonable. Jinhu tire has been in the first place in the OE supporting market for a long time, but its employees have not received the due welfare treatment. The workers' wages in Changchun factory are only about 1200 yuan after tax, and there is no obvious increase in wages within a few years after the establishment of the factory. Finally, the workers went on strike because of dissatisfaction with the low treatment
three days after the strike in Changchun factory, the news came out through forums, microblogs and other channels. At this time, when the author called the relevant person in charge of Jinhu, the other party actually said that he did not know. If the person in charge did not deliberately hide from the author, it can only be understood that there are problems in the internal information communication mechanism and system
third, Jinhu needs localization exercise. Jinbanyuan step test block (HS) lake, which lives in the supporting market, obviously does not understand China's national conditions very well. After the crisis, it is not clear how to face consumers and the media directly, and it is also lack of corresponding staffing
due to the mechanism of Jinhu company, the management and important positions are mostly held by Korean people, and some important speeches are mostly completed by Korean senior management. Before the Jinhu crisis, Jinhu China didn't even have a spokesman. After Li Hanxie communicated with the media on May 15, but was accused of "retracting his confession", Jinhu thought that it needed a spokesman who knew the Chinese market, so it hurriedly appointed a Chinese person as the spokesman
for the recall data, strikes and other information that the media want to know, Jinhu is also mostly secretive and lacks proactive information disclosure. Jinhu hopes to "cool down naturally" by this, but it has another meaning in the eyes of consumers and the media
as for Jinhu public relations team, the public relations skills of individual personnel also need to be improved. The relevant person in charge of Jinhu China has been angry with the author's report on Jinhu for several times. Although he apologized repeatedly afterwards, his impulsive character obviously did not meet the requirements of the Public Relations post
note: the reprinted content is indicated with the source. The reprint is for the purpose of transmitting more information, and does not mean to agree with its views or confirm the authenticity of its content